Yu Cong Eng v. Trinidad
Yu Cong Eng v. Trinidad | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Argued April 12–13, 1926 Decided June 7, 1926 | |||||||
Full case name | Yu Cong Eng, et al. v. Trinidad, Collector, et al. | ||||||
Citations |
46 S. Ct. 619; 70 L. Ed. 1059; 1926 U.S. LEXIS 642 | ||||||
Prior history | Supreme Court of the Philippines | ||||||
Holding | |||||||
The Chinese Bookkeeping Act violated the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Philippine Autonomy Act. | |||||||
Court membership | |||||||
| |||||||
Case opinions | |||||||
Majority | Taft, joined by unanimous | ||||||
Laws applied | |||||||
Philippine Autonomy Act |
Yu Cong Eng v. Trinidad, 271 U.S. 500 (1926), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a law passed by the US colonial government of the Philippines in 1921, Act No. 2972 of the Philippine Legislature, known as the "Chinese Bookkeeping Act," was unconstitutional. It prevented business records from being kept in the Chinese language.
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 6/28/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.