Yonge v Toynbee

Yonge v Toynbee
Full case name Yonge v Toynbee
Decided 1910
Citation(s) [1910] 1 KB 215
Keywords
insanity

Yonge v Toynbee [1910] 1 KB 215 is a case regarding the legal effects of a party entering into a contract to be later discovered to be insane.

Background

The plaintiff commenced defamation action in the court against the defendant, and instructed the lawyers W and Sons to act on their behalf. Unfortunately during these proceedings, and entirely unbeknown to their lawyers, the plaintiff was declared legally insane. As a result, the plaintiff’s legal action was struck out by the court by the defendant, and then sought costs from W and Sons on the basis that they had no legal authority to represent the defendant, as the defendant being insane, even though they had no knowledge of this at the time. The defendant was not legally liable for these costs, due to their insanity.

Held

The defendants lawyers were liable for costs, as their implied agency to act on the behalf of their defendant ended with the insanity of their client.

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 12/4/2014. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.