Van Dusen v. Barrack
Van Dusen v. Barrack | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Argued January 8–9, 1964 Decided March 30, 1964 | |||||||
Full case name | Van Dusen, U.S. District Judge, et al. v. Barrack, Administratrix, et al. | ||||||
Citations |
84 S. Ct. 805; 11 L. Ed. 2d 945; 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1537 | ||||||
Court membership | |||||||
| |||||||
Case opinions | |||||||
Majority | Goldberg, joined by Warren, Douglas, Clark, Harlan, Brennan, Stewart, White | ||||||
Concurrence | Black |
Van Dusen v. Barrack, 376 U.S. 612 (1964), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that when a case is transferred from a federal court in one state to a federal court in another, the choice of law should be that of the state in which the case was originally filed.[1]
References
- ↑ Yeazell, S.C. Civil Procedure, Seventh Edition. Aspen Publishers, New York, NY: 2008, p. 231
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 6/6/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.