Tuidang movement

Tuidang Service Center outside Causeway Bay Station in Hong Kong.
Tuidang Service Center in Flushing, Queens, in New York City.[1]

The Tuidang movement (退黨運動/退党运动; Tuìdǎng yùndòng) is a Chinese dissident phenomenon that began in late 2004. The movement, whose name translates literally as "withdraw from the [Communist] party," was catalyzed by the publication of the editorial series "Nine Commentaries on the Communist Party" (九评共产党; Jiuping Gongchandang) in the U.S.-based Chinese-language newspaper The Epoch Times (Dajiyuan). The series criticized Communist Party rule in China, with a focus on the party's history of political repression, its propaganda apparatus, and its assaults on traditional culture and value systems.

Soon after the publication the Nine Commentaries, The Epoch Times began publishing letters from readers wishing to symbolically disavow their affiliations to Communist Party organizations, including the Communist Youth League and Young Pioneers. Among the movement's participants are political dissidents, lawyers, scholars, diplomats, and former police or military personnel.[2][3][4]

Background

Cover of the "Nine Commentaries on the Communist Party," a collection of editorials that catalyzed the Tuidang movement and outlines its philosophy.

The Tuidang movement, and the publication of the Nine Commentaries in particular, can be understood in part as an outgrowth of the Falun Gong movement's resistance to persecution in China.

Falun Gong is a qigong practice with roots in Buddhist and Daoist philosophy which has enjoyed great popularity since it was made public in 1992.[5] Since 1999, it has been severely persecuted by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).[6][7] Ethan Gutmann interviewed over 100 witnesses and estimated that 65,000 Falun Gong practitioners were killed for their organs from 2000 to 2008.[8][9][10][11]

In the early 2000s, United States-based practitioners created news organizations intended to challenge the Communist Party's hegemony over Chinese-language media and provide an opposition voice. Through these organizations, notably The Epoch Times and New Tang Dynasty Television, Falun Gong came to establish a "de facto media alliance" with other Chinese dissident groups.[12]

As part of its struggle against the CCP, The Epoch Times published the Nine Commentaries on the Communist Party in November 2004, and began inviting readers to renounce the party. Hu Ping describes this foray into political commentary a "logical progression" resulting from Falun Gong's inability to end the persecution against them through other means, but points out that the practice itself is apolitical in nature: "Originally Falun Gong aimed the brunt of its criticism at Jiang Zemin, but after Jiang left office and the new Hu Jintao regime refused to rehabilitate Falun Gong and continued to persecute practitioners, Falun Gong broadened its aim to include the entire regime and the Communist Party ... This change, if not exactly natural, must surely be considered reasonable. If some people insist on regarding Falun Gong as political, it can only be in the sense that Vaclav Havel described as "antipolitical politics."[13]

Nine Commentaries on the Communist Party

The Nine Commentaries on the Communist Party is a book-length collection of nine editorials which present a critical history of Communist Party rule from the Yan'an Rectification Movement to the present. It details events such as the Great Leap Forward and resulting famine, the Cultural Revolution, the destruction and appropriation of religions, the 1989 Tiananmen Square Massacre, and the persecution of Falun Gong, among other topics which are subject to censorship in mainland China.

In addition to the historical accounts, the Nine Commentaries contains lengthy editorializing on the nature and character of the Communist Party, arguing that it is innately violent, duplicitous, immoral, and that its philosophy betrays the Tao and universal laws.[14] Unlike some Chinese dissident movements that draw heavily on liberal democratic concepts,the Tuidang movement "employs distinctly Chinese language and meaning. More Confucian than humanist, [the Nine Commentaries] often makes its points by drawing on Buddhist and Daoist spirituality. Denouncing the party is thus not simply political activism, but takes on spiritual meaning as a process of cleansing the conscience and reconnecting to traditional ethics and values."[3]

The Nine Commentaries does not explicitly set out recommendations for an alternative political system in China, nor does it view institutional change as the solution to the country's ills.[14] It is like other Falun Gong writings, which in the words of historian Arthur Waldron, "espouse cures to the pathologies of communism in the traditional Chinese values of truthfulness and human heartedness."[15]

The series itself has received mixed reviews in the Western world. Historian David Ownby writes of the series "Although there is undoubtedly some truth in the commentaries, they lack balance and nuance, and read like the anti-Communist propaganda written in Taiwan in the 1950s."[16] By contrast, the Asian American Journalists Association bestowed an award on the Epoch Times for the series' publication in 2005.[17][18]

Dissemination in China

Copies of the Nine Commentaries have been sent into China from abroad by email, fax, or snail mail. In February 2006, Forbes magazine estimated that over 172 million copies had been sent into China through these means. A documentary version of the series is broadcast into Mainland China via satellite by New Tang Dynasty Television.[19] The internet has also played an important role both in disseminating copies of the Nine Commentaries and circulating information on the resulting response.[20][21]

Activists within China adopt their own methods of dissemination, including distributing copies door-to-door, or displaying slogans in public locations.[3] In rural areas and northern cities such as Beijing, Falun Gong adherents print Tuidang-related slogans on RMB bank notes. The Financial Times reported a typical message as reading "Chinese Communist Party is destined to be destroyed by heaven, the lives of those who resign from the Communist Party will be quickly saved!"[22]

Withdrawing from the Party

Following the publication of the Nine Commentaries, The Epoch Times' website began publishing letters from readers stating their desire to sever their affiliations to the Communist Party, Communist Youth League and Young Pioneers. The newspaper created a website dedicated to the cause, which featured an online submission form for statements. For reasons of personal safety, many participants sign using aliases.[14]

The process of issuing withdrawal statements is referred to in Chinese as "Tuìdǎng" (退党), which can be translated as "withdraw from the party" or "quit the party." The term is something of a misnomer, as average citizens aren't able to officially leave the party and risk imprisonment if they speak out against it.[23]

As of March 2015, The Epoch Times has posted over 195 million names and aliases of Tuidang participants.[24] Due to the anonymous nature of the statements, these numbers are difficult to verify.[3][20] Nonetheless, says Ethan Gutmann, "the significance is very real. [The Tuidang statements] are promissory gestures of rejection from Chinese citizens of all backgrounds and beliefs. And while the numbers are as shaky as any Internet-based survey, I think we can say with confidence that it is well into the millions."[21]

Notable participants

A number of high-profile Chinese dissidents are counted among the Tuidang movement's participants. These include Wei Jingsheng, a leader of the 1978 Beijing Spring democracy movement; human rights lawyers including Gao Zhisheng, Guo Guoting,[2] and Zheng Enchong; and defectors Chen Yonglin, Hao Fengjun and Li Fengzhi.[4]

Other participants whose stories have attracted media attention are Masha Ma, a University of Toronto graduate student who resigned from the Communist Party after watching a documentary on the Tiananmen Square Massacre and reading the Nine Commentaries.[2] 74-year-old Ding Weikun, Communist Party veteran from Zhejiang Province renounced his membership after he was jailed for his protests against a land grab by the local government in his village.[3]

Communist Party response

The Communist Party authorities and public security agencies have responded to the Tuidang movement through censorship and coercive measures, including the arrest of dozens of participants.[3] A 2005 study conducted jointly by researchers from Harvard University, Cambridge University and the University of Toronto found that words related to the Tuidang movement were the most intensively censored terms on the Chinese internet.[25] A series of editorials published in the journal of the People's Liberation Army in March 2011 intended to refute the demands of reformers contained an inadvertent admission that the Tuidang movement was having an effect of undermining morale within the military's rank and file.[26]

See also

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Tuidang movement.

References

  1. ↑ "Tuidang Movement". Places to Go In US. Retrieved September 14, 2015.
  2. 1 2 3 Kevin Steel, 'Revolution number nine,' The Western Standard, 11 July 2005.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Caylan Ford, "An underground challenge to China's status quo," The Christian Science Monitor, 21 Oct 2009.
  4. 1 2 Bill Gertz, 'Chinese spy who defects tells all', Washington Times, 19 March 2009.
  5. ↑ Renee Schoff, "Growing group poses a dilemma for China," Associated Press, April 26, 1999.
  6. ↑ Amnesty International, "China: The crackdown on Falun Gong and other so-called "heretical organizations", 23 March 2000
  7. ↑ Congressional Executive Commission on China, 'Annual Report 2009', 10 October 2009
  8. ↑ Jay Nordlinger (25 August 2014) "Face The Slaughter: The Slaughter: Mass Killings, Organ Harvesting, and China’s Secret Solution to Its Dissident Problem, by Ethan Gutmann", National Review
  9. ↑ Viv Young (11 August 2014) "The Slaughter: Mass Killings, Organ Harvesting, and China’s Secret Solution to Its Dissident Problem" New York Journal of Books
  10. ↑ Ethan Gutmann (August 2014) The Slaughter: Mass Killings, Organ Harvesting and China’s Secret Solution to Its Dissident Problem "Average number of Falun Gong in Laogai System at any given time" Low estimate 450,000, High estimate 1,000,000 p 320. "Best estimate of Falun Gong harvested 2000 to 2008" 65,000 p 322. amazon.com
  11. ↑ Barbara Turnbull (21 October 2014) "Q&A: Author and analyst Ethan Gutmann discusses China’s illegal organ trade" The Toronto Star
  12. ↑ Zhao, Yuezhi (2003). Falun Gong, Identity, and the Struggle over Meaning Inside and Outside China. Rowman & Littlefield publishers, inc.. pp. 209–223. ISBN 978-0-7425-2385-2.
  13. ↑ Hu Ping, The Falun Gong Phenomenon, in "Challenging China: Struggle and Hope in an Era of Change," Sharon Hom and Stacy Mosher ed. Human Rights in China, 2008. pp 228 - 230.
  14. 1 2 3 Falun Dafa Information Center, 'The Tuidang Movement and Falun Gong', 1 July 2011.
  15. ↑ Arthur Waldron, "The Falun Gong Factor", 28 June 2007.
  16. ↑ David Ownby, Falun Gong and the Future of China, (Oxford University Press 2008), p 221.
  17. ↑ The Epoch Times, 'Nine Commentaries Wins National Journalism Award in U.S., August 19, 2005.
  18. ↑ "Asian American Journalists Association Recognizes Excellence in News Coverage", The Free Library (23 August 2005) Retrieved 28 Apr 2013
  19. ↑ Richard Morais, "Cracks in the Wall", Forbes, Feb 27 2006.
  20. 1 2 Patricia Thonrton, Manufacturing Dissent in Transnational China in "Popular Protest in China," Kevin O'Brien ed. Harvard University Press 2008.
  21. 1 2 Ethan Gutmann, The Chinese Internet: A dream deferred?, Testimony given at the National Endowment for Democracy panel discussion "Tiananmen 20 years on", 2 June 2009.
  22. ↑ Jamil Anderlini, Rmb:Falun Gong's new voice, Financial Times blog, 22 July 2011.
  23. ↑ Robertson, Matthew. "Gao Zhisheng To Serve Three Year Prison Sentence". The Epoch Times Newspaper. Retrieved 12 August 2012.
  24. ↑ Tuidang movement homepage
  25. ↑ Jonathan Zittrain et al, "Internet Filtering in China in 2004-2005: A Country Study" April 15, 2005.
  26. ↑ Ching Cheong, 'China prepares for war without gun smoke', Jakarta Globe, 16 April 2011.


This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 10/12/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.