Strength reduction

In software engineering, strength reduction is a compiler optimization where expensive operations are replaced with equivalent but less expensive operations. The classic example of strength reduction converts "strong" multiplications inside a loop into "weaker" additions – something that frequently occurs in array addressing. (Cooper, Simpson & Vick 1995, p. 1)

Examples of strength reduction include:

replacing a multiplication within a loop with an addition
replacing an exponentiation within a loop with a multiplication

Code analysis

Most of a program's execution time is typically spent in a small section of code (called a hot spot), and that code is often inside a loop that is executed over and over.

A compiler uses methods to identify loops and recognize the characteristics of register values within those loops. For strength reduction, the compiler is interested in

loop invariants. These are the values that do not change within the body of a loop.
induction variables. These are the values that are being iterated each time through the loop.

Loop invariants are essentially constants within a loop, but their value may change outside of the loop. Induction variables are changing by known amounts. The terms are relative to a particular loop. When loops are nested, an induction variable in the outer loop can be a loop invariant in the inner loop.

Strength reduction looks for expressions involving a loop invariant and an induction variable. Some of those expressions can be simplified. For example, the multiplication of loop invariant c and induction variable i

c = 7;
for (i = 0; i < N; i++)
{
    y[i] = c * i;
}

can be replaced with successive weaker additions

c = 7;
k = 0;
for (i = 0; i < N; i++)
{
    y[i] = k;
    k = k + c;
}

Strength reduction example

Below is an example that will strength-reduce all the loop multiplications that arose from array indexing address calculations.

Imagine a simple loop that sets an array to the identity matrix.

for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
{
    for (j = 0; j < n; j++)
    {
        A[i,j] = 0.0;
    } 
    A[i,i] = 1.0;
}

Intermediate code

The compiler will view this code as

0010  // for (i = 0, i < n; i++)
0020    {
0030      r1 = #0                        // i = 0
0040  G0000:
0050      load r2, n                     // i < n
0060      cmp r1, r2
0070      bge G0001
0080  
0090      // for (j = 0; j < n; j++)
0100        {
0110           r3   = #0                 // j = 0
0120  G0002:
0130           load r4, n                // j < n
0140           cmp r3, r4
0150           bge G0003
0160  
0170           // A[i,j] = 0.0;
0180           load r7, n
0190           r8  = r1 * r7             // calculate subscript i * n + j
0200           r9  = r8 + r3
0210           r10 = r9 * #8             // calculate byte address
0220           fr3 = #0.0
0230           fstore fr3, A[r10]
0240  
0250           r3 = r3 + #1              // j++
0260           br G0002
0270        }
0280  G0003:
0290      // A[i,i] = 1.0;
0300      load r12, n                    // calculate subscript i * n + i
0310      r13 = r1 * r12               
0320      r14 = r13 + r1
0330      r15 = r14 * #8                 // calculate byte address
0340      fr4 = #1.0
0350      fstore fr4, A[r15]
0360  
0370      //i++
0380      r1 = r1 + #1
0390      br G0000
0400    }
0410  G0001:

This expresses 2-dimensional array A as a 1-dimensional array of n*n size, so that whenever the high-level code expresses A[x, y] it will internally be A[(x*n)+y] for any given valid indices x and y.

Many optimizations

The compiler will start doing many optimizations – not just strength reduction. Expressions that are constant (invariant) within a loop will be hoisted out of the loop. Constants can be loaded outside of both loops—such as floating point registers fr3 and fr4. Recognition that some variables don't change allow registers to be merged; n is constant, so r2, r4, r7, r12 can be hoisted and collapsed. The common value i*n is computed in (the hoisted) r8 and r13, so they collapse. The innermost loop (0120-0260) has been reduced from 11 to 7 intermediate instructions. The only multiply that remains in the innermost loop is line 0210's multiply by 8.

0010  // for (i = 0, i < n; i++)
0020    {
0030      r1 = #0                        // i = 0
0050      load r2, n
0130 //   load r4, n     killed; use r2
0180 //   load r7, n     killed; use r2
0300 //   load r12, n    killed; use r2
0220      fr3 = #0.0
0340      fr4 = #1.0
0040  G0000:
0060      cmp r1, r2                     // i < n
0070      bge G0001
0080  
0190      r8  = r1 * r2                  // calculate subscript i * n
0310 //   r13 = r1 * r2  killed; use r8  // calculate subscript i * n
0090      // for (j = 0; j < n; j++)
0100        {
0110           r3   = #0                 // j = 0
0120  G0002:
0140           cmp r3, r2                // j < n
0150           bge G0003
0160  
0170           // A[i,j] = 0.0;
0200           r9  = r8 + r3             // calculate subscript i * n + j
0210           r10 = r9 * #8             // calculate byte address
0230           fstore fr3, A[r10]
0240  
0250           r3 = r3 + #1              // j++
0260           br G0002
0270        }
0280  G0003:
0290      // A[i,i] = 1.0;
0320      r14 = r8  + r1                 // calculate subscript i * n + i
0330      r15 = r14 * #8                 // calculate byte address
0350      fstore fr4, A[r15]
0360  
0370      //i++
0380      r1 = r1 + #1
0390      br G0000
0400    }
0410  G0001:

There are more optimizations to go. Register r3 is the main variable in the innermost loop (0140-0260); it gets incremented by 1 each time through the loop. Register r8 (which is invariant in the innermost loop) is added to r3. Instead of using r3, the compiler can eliminate r3 and use r9. The loop, instead of being controlled by r3 = 0 to n-1, it can be controlled by r9=r8+0 to r8+n-1. That adds four instructions and kills four instructions, but there's one fewer instruction inside the loop

0110  //       r3   = #0     killed      // j = 0
0115           r9   = r8                 // new assignment
0117           r20  = r8 + r2            // new limit
0120  G0002:
0140  //       cmp r3, r2    killed      // j < n
0145           cmp r9, r20               // r8 + j < r8 + n = r20
0150           bge G0003
0160  
0170           // A[i,j] = 0.0;
0200  //       r9  = r8 + r3 killed      // calculate subscript i * n + j
0210           r10 = r9 * #8             // calculate byte address
0230           fstore fr3, A[r10]
0240  
0250  //       r3 = r3 + #1  killed      // j++
0255           r9 = r9 + #1              // new loop variable
0260           br G0002

Now r9 is the loop variable, but it interacts with the multiply by 8. Here we get to do some strength reduction. The multiply by 8 can be reduced to some successive additions of 8. Now there are no multiplications inside the loop.

0115           r9   = r8                 // new assignment
0117           r20  = r8 + r2            // new limit
0118           r10  = r8 * #8            // initial value of r10
0120  G0002:
0145           cmp r9, r20               // r8 + j < r8 + n = r20
0150           bge G0003
0160  
0170           // A[i,j] = 0.0;
0210  //       r10 = r9 * #8    killed   // calculate byte address
0230           fstore fr3, A[r10]
0240  
0245           r10 = r10 + #8            // strength reduced multiply
0255           r9 = r9 + #1              // loop variable
0260           br G0002

Registers r9 and r10 (= 8*r9) aren't both needed; r9 can be eliminated in the loop. The loop is now 5 instructions.

0115  //       r9   = r8         killed
0117           r20  = r8 + r2            // limit
0118           r10  = r8 * #8            // initial value of r10
0119           r22  = r20 * #8           // new limit
0120  G0002:
0145  //       cmp r9, r20       killed  // r8 + j < r8 + n = r20
0147           cmp r10, r22              // r10 = 8*(r8 + j) < 8*(r8 + n) = r22
0150           bge G0003
0160  
0170           // A[i,j] = 0.0;
0230           fstore fr3, A[r10]
0240  
0245           r10 = r10 + #8            // strength reduced multiply
0255  //       r9 = r9 + #1      killed  // loop variable
0260           br G0002

Outer loop

Back to the whole picture:

0010  // for (i = 0, i < n; i++)
0020    {
0030      r1 = #0                        // i = 0
0050      load r2, n
0220      fr3 = #0.0
0340      fr4 = #1.0
0040  G0000:
0060      cmp r1, r2                     // i < n
0070      bge G0001
0080  
0190      r8   = r1 * r2                 // calculate subscript i * n
0117      r20  = r8 + r2                 // limit
0118      r10  = r8 * #8                 // initial value of r10
0119      r22  = r20 * #8                // new limit
0090      // for (j = 0; j < n; j++)
0100        {
0120  G0002:
0147           cmp r10, r22              // r10 = 8*(r8 + j) < 8*(r8 + n) = r22
0150           bge G0003
0160  
0170           // A[i,j] = 0.0;
0230           fstore fr3, A[r10]
0240  
0245           r10 = r10 + #8            // strength reduced multiply
0260           br G0002
0270        }
0280  G0003:
0290      // A[i,i] = 1.0;
0320      r14 = r8  + r1                 // calculate subscript i * n + i
0330      r15 = r14 * #8                 // calculate byte address
0350      fstore fr4, A[r15]
0360  
0370      //i++
0380      r1 = r1 + #1
0390      br G0000
0400    }
0410  G0001:

There are now four multiplications within the outer loop that increments r1. Register r8 = r1*r2 at 0190 can be strength reduced by setting it before entering the loop (0055) and incrementing it by r2 at the bottom of the loop (0385).

The value r8*8 (at 0118) can strength reduced by initializing it (0056) and adding 8*r2 to it when r8 gets incremented (0386).

Register r20 is being incremented by the invariant/constant r2 each time through the loop at 0117. After being incremented, it is multiplied by 8 to create r22 at 0119. That multiplication can be strength reduced by adding 8*r2 each time through the loop.

0010  // for (i = 0, i < n; i++)
0020    {
0030      r1 = #0                        // i = 0
0050      load r2, n
0220      fr3 = #0.0
0340      fr4 = #1.0
0055      r8  = r1 * r2                  // set initial value for r8
0056      r40 = r8 * #8                  // initial value for r8 * 8
0057      r30 = r2 * #8                  // increment for r40
0058      r20 = r8 + r2                  // copied from 0117
0058      r22 = r20 * #8                 // initial value of r22
0040  G0000:
0060      cmp r1, r2                     // i < n
0070      bge G0001
0080  
0190  //  r8   = r1 * r2    killed       // calculate subscript i * n
0117  //  r20  = r8 + r2    killed - dead code
0118      r10  = r40                     // strength reduced expression to r40
0119  //  r22  = r20 * #8   killed       // strength reduced
0090      // for (j = 0; j < n; j++)
0100        {
0120  G0002:
0147           cmp r10, r22              // r10 = 8*(r8 + j) < 8*(r8 + n) = r22
0150           bge G0003
0160  
0170           // A[i,j] = 0.0;
0230           fstore fr3, A[r10]
0240  
0245           r10 = r10 + #8            // strength reduced multiply
0260           br G0002
0270        }
0280  G0003:
0290      // A[i,i] = 1.0;
0320      r14 = r8  + r1                 // calculate subscript i * n + i
0330      r15 = r14 * #8                 // calculate byte address
0350      fstore fr4, A[r15]
0360
0370      //i++
0380      r1  = r1 + #1
0385      r8  = r8 + r2                  // strength reduce r8 = r1 * r2
0386      r40 = r40 + r30                // strength reduce expression r8 * 8
0388      r22 = r22 + r30                // strength reduce r22 = r20 * 8  
0390      br G0000
0400    }
0410  G0001:

The last multiply

That leaves the two loops with only one multiplication operation (at 0330) within the outer loop and no multiplications within the inner loop.

0010  // for (i = 0, i < n; i++)
0020    {
0030      r1 = #0                        // i = 0
0050      load r2, n
0220      fr3 = #0.0
0340      fr4 = #1.0
0055      r8  = r1 * r2                  // set initial value for r8
0056      r40 = r8 * #8                  // initial value for r8 * 8
0057      r30 = r2 * #8                  // increment for r40
0058      r20 = r8 + r2                  // copied from 0117
0058      r22 = r20 * #8                 // initial value of r22
0040  G0000:
0060      cmp r1, r2                     // i < n
0070      bge G0001
0080  
0118      r10  = r40                     // strength reduced expression to r40
0090      // for (j = 0; j < n; j++)
0100        {
0120  G0002:
0147           cmp r10, r22              // r10 = 8*(r8 + j) < 8*(r8 + n) = r22
0150           bge G0003
0160  
0170           // A[i,j] = 0.0;
0230           fstore fr3, A[r10]
0240  
0245           r10 = r10 + #8            // strength reduced multiply
0260           br G0002
0270        }
0280  G0003:
0290      // A[i,i] = 1.0;
0320      r14 = r8  + r1                 // calculate subscript i * n + i
0330      r15 = r14 * #8                 // calculate byte address
0350      fstore fr4, A[r15]
0360
0370      //i++
0380      r1  = r1 + #1
0385      r8  = r8 + r2                  // strength reduce r8 = r1 * r2
0386      r40 = r40 + r30                // strength reduce expression r8 * 8
0388      r22 = r22 + r30                // strength reduce r22 = r20 * 8  
0390      br G0000
0400    }
0410  G0001:

At line 0320, r14 is the sum of r8 and r1, and r8 and r1 are being incremented in the loop. Register r8 is being bumped by r2 (=n) and r1 is being bumped by 1. Consequently, r14 is being bumped by n+1 each time through the loop. The last loop multiply at 0330 can be strength reduced by adding (r2+1)*8 each time through the loop.

0010  // for (i = 0, i < n; i++)
0020    {
0030      r1 = #0                        // i = 0
0050      load r2, n
0220      fr3 = #0.0
0340      fr4 = #1.0
0055      r8  = r1 * r2                  // set initial value for r8
0056      r40 = r8 * #8                  // initial value for r8 * 8
0057      r30 = r2 * #8                  // increment for r40
0058      r20 = r8 + r2                  // copied from 0117
0058      r22 = r20 * #8                 // initial value of r22
005A      r14 = r8 + #1                  // copied from 0320
005B      r15 = r14 * #8                 // initial value of r15 (0330)
005C      r49 = r2 + 1
005D      r50 = r49 * #8                 // strength reduced increment
0040  G0000:
0060      cmp r1, r2                     // i < n
0070      bge G0001
0080  
0118      r10  = r40                     // strength reduced expression to r40
0090      // for (j = 0; j < n; j++)
0100        {
0120  G0002:
0147           cmp r10, r22              // r10 = 8*(r8 + j) < 8*(r8 + n) = r22
0150           bge G0003
0160  
0170           // A[i,j] = 0.0;
0230           fstore fr3, A[r10]
0240  
0245           r10 = r10 + #8            // strength reduced multiply
0260           br G0002
0270        }
0280  G0003:
0290      // A[i,i] = 1.0;
0320  //  r14 = r8  + r1     killed      // dead code
0330  //  r15 = r14 * #8     killed      // strength reduced
0350      fstore fr4, A[r15]
0360
0370      //i++
0380      r1  = r1 + #1
0385      r8  = r8 + r2                  // strength reduce r8 = r1 * r2
0386      r40 = r40 + r30                // strength reduce expression r8 * 8
0388      r22 = r22 + r30                // strength reduce r22 = r20 * 8
0389      r15 = r15 + r50                // strength reduce r15 = r14 * 8  
0390      br G0000
0400    }
0410  G0001:

There's still more to go. Constant folding will recognize that r1=0 in the preamble, so several instructions will clean up. Register r8 isn't used in the loop, so it can disappear.

Furthermore, r1 is only being used to control the loop, so r1 can be replaced by a different induction variable such as r40. Where i went 0 <= i < n, register r40 goes 0 <= r40 < 8 * n * n.

0010  // for (i = 0, i < n; i++)
0020    {
0030  //  r1 = #0                        // i = 0, becomes dead code
0050      load r2, n
0220      fr3 = #0.0
0340      fr4 = #1.0
0055  //  r8  = #0         killed        // r8 no longer used
0056      r40 = #0                       // initial value for r8 * 8
0057      r30 = r2 * #8                  // increment for r40
0058  //  r20 = r2         killed        // r8 = 0, becomes dead code
0058      r22 = r2  * #8                 // r20 = r2
005A  //  r14 =       #1   killed        // r8 = 0, becomes dead code
005B      r15 =       #8                 // r14 = 1
005C      r49 = r2 + 1
005D      r50 = r49 * #8                 // strength reduced increment
005D      r60 = r2 * r30                 // new limit for r40
0040  G0000:
0060  //  cmp r1, r2       killed        // i < n; induction variable replaced
0065      cmp r40, r60                   // i * 8 * n < 8 * n * n
0070      bge G0001
0080  
0118      r10  = r40                     // strength reduced expression to r40
0090      // for (j = 0; j < n; j++)
0100        {
0120  G0002:
0147           cmp r10, r22              // r10 = 8*(r8 + j) < 8*(r8 + n) = r22
0150           bge G0003
0160  
0170           // A[i,j] = 0.0;
0230           fstore fr3, A[r10]
0240  
0245           r10 = r10 + #8            // strength reduced multiply
0260           br G0002
0270        }
0280  G0003:
0290      // A[i,i] = 1.0;
0350      fstore fr4, A[r15]
0360
0370      //i++
0380  //  r1  = r1 + #1      killed      // dead code (r40 controls loop)
0385  //  r8  = r8 + r2      killed      // dead code
0386      r40 = r40 + r30                // strength reduce expression r8 * 8
0388      r22 = r22 + r30                // strength reduce r22 = r20 * 8
0389      r15 = r15 + r50                // strength reduce r15 = r14 * 8  
0390      br G0000
0400    }
0410  G0001:

Other strength reduction operations

This material is disputed. It is better described as peephole optimization and instruction assignment.

Operator strength reduction uses mathematical identities to replace slow math operations with faster operations. The benefits depend on the target CPU and sometimes on the surrounding code (which can affect the availability of other functional units within the CPU).

replacing integer division or multiplication by a power of 2 with an arithmetic shift or logical shift^[1]
replacing integer multiplication by a constant with a combination of shifts, adds or subtracts
replacing integer division by a constant with a multiplication, taking advantage of the limited range of machine integers.^[2]

Original calculation	Replacement calculation
y = x / 8	y = x >> 3
y = x * 64	y = x << 6
y = x * 2	y = x << 1
y = x * 15	y = (x << 4) - x

Induction variable (orphan)

Induction variable or recursive strength reduction replaces a function of some systematically changing variable with a simpler calculation using previous values of the function. In a procedural programming language this would apply to an expression involving a loop variable and in a declarative language it would apply to the argument of a recursive function. For example,

f x = ... (2 ** x) ... (f (x + 1)) ...

becomes

f x = f' x 1
where
  f' x z = ... z ... (f' (x + 1) (2 * z)) ...

Here the expensive operation (2 ** x) has been replaced by the cheaper (2 * z) in the recursive function f'. This maintains the invariant that z = 2 ** x for any call to f'.

Notes

↑ In languages such as C and Java, integer division has round-towards-zero semantics, whereas a bit-shift always rounds down, requiring special treatment for negative numbers. For example, in Java, -3 / 2 evaluates to -1, whereas -3 >> 1 evaluates to -2. So in this case, the compiler cannot optimize division by two by replacing it by a bit shift.
↑ Granlund, Torbjörn; Peter L. Montgomery. "Division by Invariant Integers Using Multiplication" (PDF).

References

Aho, Alfred V.; Sethi, Ravi; Ullman, Jeffrey D. (1986), Compilers: Principles, Techniques, and Tools (2nd ed.), ISBN 978-0-201-10088-4
Allen, Francis E.; Cocke, John; Kennedy, Ken (1981), "Reduction of Operator Strength", in Munchnik, Steven S.; Jones, Neil D., Program Flow Analysis: Theory and Applications, Prentice-Hall, ISBN 978-0-13-729681-1
Cocke, John; Kennedy, Ken (November 1977), "An algorithm for reduction of operator strength", Communications of the ACM, 20 (11), doi:10.1145/359863.359888
Cooper, Keith; Simpson, Taylor; Vick, Christopher (October 1995), Operator Strength Reduction (PDF), Rice University, retrieved April 22, 2010

This article is based on material taken from the Free On-line Dictionary of Computing prior to 1 November 2008 and incorporated under the "relicensing" terms of the GFDL, version 1.3 or later.

Compiler optimizations

Basic block	Peephole optimization

Loop optimization	Induction variable Strength reduction Loop fusion Loop inversion Loop interchange Loop-invariant code motion Loop nest optimization Loop unrolling Loop splitting Loop unswitching Software pipelining Automatic parallelization

Data-flow analysis	Common subexpression elimination Constant folding Induction variable recognition and elimination Dead store elimination Use-define chain Live variable analysis Available expression

SSA-based	Global value numbering Sparse conditional constant propagation

Code generation	Register allocation Instruction selection Instruction scheduling Rematerialization

Functional	Tail call elimination Deforestation

Global	Interprocedural optimization

Other	Bounds-checking elimination Dead code elimination Inline expansion Jump threading

Static analysis	Alias analysis Pointer analysis Shape analysis Escape analysis Array access analysis Dependence analysis Control flow analysis Data flow analysis

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 1/7/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.