Skipper v. South Carolina

Skipper v. South Carolina

Argued February 24th, 1986
Decided April 29, 1986
Full case name Skipper v. South Carolina
Citations

476 U.S. 1 (more)

Holding
The trial court's exclusion from the sentencing hearing of the testimony of the jailers and the visitor denied petitioner his right to place before the sentencing jury all relevant evidence in mitigation of punishment.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Warren E. Burger
Case opinions
Majority White, joined by Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun, Stevens, O'Connor
Concurrence Powell, joined by Burger, Rehnquist
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amends. VIII, XIV

Skipper v. South Carolina, 476 U.S. 1 (1986), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the rule from Lockett v. Ohio (1978) dictated that mitigating evidence not be subject to limitations based on relevance.

Background

Ronald DeRay Skipper was convicted of capital murder and rape in South Carolina. During the penalty phase of his bifurcated trial, as required by Gregg v. Georgia (1976), Skipper sought to introduce as mitigating evidence that he had "adjusted well" to his pre-trial incarceration. The trial court ruled the evidence irrelevant, in keeping with controlling South Carolina caselaw, excluded the evidence. Skipper was subsequently sentenced to death.

Holding

The Court held that, under Lockett, the exclusion of mitigating evidence on relevance grounds, as articulated by the South Carolina Supreme Court, violated the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments and vacated the sentence.

See also

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 5/31/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.