NetOwl

NetOwl
Industry Software
Headquarters Chantilly, Virginia
Products NetOwl Extractor, NetOwl NameMatcher, NetOwl EntityMatcher, NetOwl TextMiner, NetOwl DocMatcher
Website http://www.netowl.com/

NetOwl is a suite of multilingual text and entity analytics products that analyze Big Data in the form of text data – reports, web, social media, etc. – as well as structured entity data about people, organizations, places, and things.

NetOwl utilizes computational linguistics, natural language processing, and machine learning approaches to extract entities, links, and events, to perform sentiment analysis, to assign latitude/longitude to geographical references in text, to translate names written in foreign languages, and to perform name matching and identity resolution.[1][2][3] NetOwl's customers use the products for, among others, semantic search and discovery,[4] geospatial analysis,[5] intelligence analysis,[6] content enrichment,[7] compliance monitoring,[8] cyber threat monitoring,[9] risk management,[10] and bioinformatics.[11]

Products

The NetOwl suite includes, among others, the following text and entity analytics products:

Text Analytics


Entity Analytics


History

The first NetOwl product was NetOwl Extractor, which was initially released in 1996.[12] Since then, Extractor has added several new capabilities, including link and event extraction, geotagging, and sentiment analysis, as well as entity extraction in other languages and name translation. Other products were added later to the NetOwl suite, namely DocMatcher, TextMiner, NameMatcher, and EntityMatcher.

NetOwl has participated in several 3rd party-sponsored text and entity analytics software benchmarking events. NetOwl Extractor was the top-scoring named entity extraction system at the DARPA-sponsored Message Understanding Conference MUC-6 and the top-scoring link and event extraction system in MUC-7.[13][14] It was also the top-scoring system at several of the NIST-sponsored Automatic Content Extraction (ACE) evaluation tasks.[15] NetOwl NameMatcher was the top-scoring system at the MITRE Challenge for Multicultural Person Name Matching.[1]

References

  1. 1 2 3 "SRA International." Washington Post. Retrieved 2013-07-02.
  2. 1 2 Zelenko, Dmitry, and Chinatsu Aone. “Discriminative Methods for Transliteration.” In Proceedings of 2006 Conference Empirical Applications of Natural Language Processing (2006). Retrieved 2013-05-20.
  3. 1 2 Maybury, Mark (2012). Multimedia Information Extraction, Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., p. 18. Retrieved 2013-07-02.
  4. Jackson, Peter; Moulinier, Isabelle (2002). Natural Language Processing for Online Applications: Text Retrieval, Extraction, and Categorization, Philadelphia: John Benjamins B.V., p. 117, ISBN 90-272-4989-X. Retrieved 2013-07-02.
  5. 1 2 3 Smith, Susan. “Notes from the GEOINT 2007 Symposium.” GISCafe (2007-10-29). Retrieved 2013-07-02.
  6. Indurkhya, Nitin et al. (2005). Text Mining: Predictive Methods for Analyzing Unstructured Information, New York: Springer, p. 154-155, ISBN 0-387-95433-3. Retrieved 2013-07-02.
  7. 1 2 Guess, Angela (2012-01-19). "LexisNexis Releases New Version of Lexis Advance". semanticweb.com. Retrieved 2013-07-28.
  8. 1 2 Aone, Chinatsu, et al. “Assentor®: an NLP-based Solution to E-mail Monitoring.” In Proceedings of the Seventeenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Twelfth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (2000), pp. 945-540. Retrieved 2013-05-20.
  9. "SRA’s Dusty Rhoads and Jim McClave: How to strengthen your company’s cybersecurity". ExecutiveBiz (2009-07-02). Retrieved 2013-08-06.
  10. “Nasdaq on the prowl.” CNN Money (1997-09-17). Retrieved 2013-07-02.
  11. Zaremba, Sam, et al. “Text-mining of PubMed abstracts by natural language processing to create a public knowledge base on molecular mechanisms of bacterial enteropathogens.” BMC Bioinformatics, 10:177 (2009-06-10). Retrieved 2013-05-20.
  12. Hudgins-Bonafield, Christine. “Filtering Knowledge On The Net Just Got Simpler.” NetWork Computing (1996-05-31). Retrieved 2013-09-03.
  13. Sundheim, Beth M. "Overview of Results of the MUC-6 Evaluation." In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Message Understanding (1995), pp. 13-31. Retrieved 2013-05-20.
  14. Aone, Chinatsu, et al. "SRA: Description Of The IE2 System Used For MUC-7." In Proceedings of the 7th Message Understanding Conference (1998). Retrieved 2013-05-20.
  15. The ACE 2005 (ACE'05) Evaluation Plan. Retrieved 2013-05-20.

See also

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 10/23/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.