Mutus Liber

Mutus Liber cover

The Mutus Liber, or Mute Book (from Latin: Silent Book), is a Hermetic philosophical work published in La Rochelle in 1677. It ranks amongst the major books on alchemy in Early Modern literature, just as much as does Atalanta Fugiens by Michael Maier. It has been reprinted numerous times.

Consisting mainly of illustrated plates, Mutus Liber arouses contradictory interpretations. Its meaning was pored over for a long time by authors such as Eugène Canseliet and Serge Hutin, who claimed to be initiated alchemists. More recent studies are striving to use its historical reality in order to reveal its meaning.[1]

Editions

The first edition of Mutus Liber dates from 1677, published by Pierre Savouret in La Rochelle.[2] No more than a few dozen copies can have been printed. Twelve original copies are conserved in main Western libraries. There may be more copies, however. As early as 1702 it was reprinted in Geneva, with new plates, and edited by Jean-Antoine Chouet and Jean-Jacques Manget. Eugène Canseliet purports seeing some pages of a Parisian edition dating from 1725. But the existence of this edition has not been established. A third version of Mutus Liber was entirely reprinted around 1760 in Paris, and this third edition is extremely rare. Mutus Liber was temporarily forgotten, but then regained editorial interest in the second half of the 19th century. Since the beginning of the 20th century, editions have multiplied, sometimes accompanied by prefaces detailing more or less precisely its contents. The main editions of Mutus Liber are the following:

History of attributions of authorship

Mutus Liber clearly indicates the names of its author and of its inventor. The former is Altus, a “scholar in high chemistry of Hermès”. The latter is Jacob Saulat, Sire of Marez. But as these assertions were soon proven to be fictitious, the authorship of Mutus Liber has long been in doubt.

Rev. Arcère, a noted historian of La Rochelle, claims that Jabob Tollé is the author though his very existence was even put in doubt.[3] Tollé was in fact a Rochelais doctor reputed for using chemistry and mastering perspective.[4] These two qualities account for the fact that he was acknowledged as the author for a long time. However, ever since the article by Jean Flouret, it has been established that the author of Mutus Liber is in fact Isaac Baulot. Using clues in Mutus Liber and contemporary documents, Patrick Sembel suggests three people were involved with Isaac Baulot. Abrahaim Thévenin probably worked on the plates, as the presence of his monetary symbol on the first illustrated page of Mutus Liber indicates. Elie Bouhéreau and Elie Richard must have contributed to the conception of the book. As doctors and scholars who used chemistry, they would have had many contacts who would facilitate publishing the book. Elie Richard studied at Groningen with Des Maretz, a philosopher whose name is used to designate the person who discovered Mutus Liber. Elie Bouhéreau knew Valentin Conrard, a secretary of the Académie Francaise, as well as many major authors and philosophers of the time. It is he who attributed authorship of Mutus Liber to Isaac Baulot.

Interpretations

The form of Mutus Liber means that is open to various interpretations. Four ways of reading the book may be distinguished

The most widespread reading is that of ‘initiated alchemists’, started off by Pierre Dujols,[5] under the pseudonym of Magophon. It is carried on by Eugène Canseliet[6] and Serge Hutin.[7] These authors say that Mutus Liber shows how to proceed to achieve the Great Work, whose ultimate purpose is to obtain the philosopher’s stone. Carl Gustav Jung, the psychoanalyst, studied Mutus Liber, and owned a copy of the 1677 edition. He used it namely to illustrate his work entitled Psychology and Alchemy.[8] In this book Jung explains how alchemy is speculative thinking looking for the spiritual equilibrium whose metaphorical form would be the philosopher’s stone. This process is accompanied by the creation of a repertoire of mental pictures, or archetypes, which would gradually lead to a collective unconscious. More recently Lee Stavenhagen worked on the narrative structure used to illustrate Mutus Liber.[9] In their research Jean Flouret and Patrick Sembel have been trying to define the contents of Mutus Liber by putting it into its religious, intellectual and scientific context.

Notes

  1. ↑ See FLOURET, Jean, « À propos de l’auteur du Mutus Liber », Revue française d’histoire du livre, n° 11 – N.S., avril-juin 1976, p. 206-211.
  2. ↑ For an analysis of the editions and attributions of authorship, see SEMBEL, Patrick, Hermès Atlantique, Le Mutus Liber, 1677, L’éloge d’éther, 2015, 65 p. ISBN 978-2-9555442-0-4.
  3. ↑ ARCÈRE, M. Histoire de la ville de La Rochelle et du Pays d’Aunis, tome 2, Chez Desbordes, La Rochelle, 1757, p 394.
  4. ↑ MONCONYS, Balthasar de, Journal des Voyages, Lyon, Boissat & Remeus, 1665, p. 20
  5. ↑ DUJOLS, Pierre, alias Magophon, Hypotypose du Mutus Liber, Paris, Editions Nourry, 1914.
  6. ↑ CANSELIET, Eugène, L’Alchimie et son livre muet, Paris, Pauvert, 1967.
  7. ↑ HUTIN, Serge, Commentaires sur le Mutus Liber, Paris, Le lien, 1967
  8. ↑ JUNG, Carl-Gustav, Psychologie et Alchimie, Buchet/Chastel, 1970, 756 p.
  9. ↑ STAVENHAGEN, Lee, « Narrative Illustration Techniques and the Mute Books of Alchemy », Explorations in Renaissance Culture, vol. 5 (1979), 56-6

External resources

http://editions-alenvers.ch/livres/mutus-liber/ http://www.tdg.ch/culture/livres/Le-Mutus-Liber-precis-d-alchimie-du-XVIIesiecle-revient-a-la-vie/story/24641229

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 10/9/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.