Learning development

Learning development describes work with students and staff to develop academic practices, with a main focus on students developing academic practices in higher education. Learning developers are academic professionals who: teach, advise and facilitate students to develop their academic practices; create academic development learning resources; and reflect on their own academic practices through a community of practice.

Hilsdon (2011: 14) defines learning development as, "a complex set of multi-disciplinary and cross-disciplinary academic roles and functions, involving teaching, tutoring, research, and the design and production of learning materials, as well as involvement in staff development, policy-making and other consultative activities."[1]

Learning development is a term used mainly within UK and Australian academia, with some overlap with academic advising in the USA. The learning development movement in the UK has aligned itself closely with the UK Educational Development movement[2] in light of its developmental work with academic staff. However, the primary objective of learning development remains the development of student learning.

History

The learning development movement began with the recognition of a new direction of practice emerging by founding and early members of an email discussion forum Community in 2002, which was transferred to the documented JISCMail Listserv Community LDHEN in 2003.[3] Early members were all involved in the provision of study skills support, but recognised the limitations of a purely study-skills approach.[4]

From 2005 onward, the establishment of the LearnHigher CETL (Centre of Excellence in Teaching and Learning) contributed greatly to the volume of publicly available learning development resources. The LearnHigher CELT was funded by the Higher Education Funding Council and comprised a consortium of teams from 16 universities, led by Liverpool Hope University to develop learning resources in 20 areas of study. LearnHigher aimed to develop and maintain a bank of open access materials for self-access by students. The CETL later referred to their work as learning development.

The LDHEN later restructured and formed the Association of Learning Development in Higher Education (ALDinHE), who published the first peer reviewed journal dedicated to learning development, The Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education. This organisation have also organised a themed national conference since 2003 and annually since 2005, contributing greatly to the development of learning development as distinct area of practice. The Staff and Educational Development Association (SEDA)have also provided space for ideas in learning development to develop, as have other student-focused organisations and conferences.

Conferences on learning development

Year Organiser Host institutionThemeKeynotes speakersResource
2016 ALDinHE Heriot-Watt University Professor Dave Hill, Dr Sian BayneYes[5]
2015 ALDinHE Southampton Solent University Professor Mick Healey, Celia Whitchurch Yes[6]
2014 ALDinHE Huddersfield University Learning Development Spaces and Places Étienne Wenger, Lesley GourlayYes[7]
2013ALDinHEPlymouth UniversityCelebrating learning developmentDave Cormier, Les Ebdon, Stella CottrellYes[8]
2012ALDinHELeeds UniversityLearning Development in a digital age: emerging literacies and learning spacesHelen Beetham, Paul Andrews, Grainne Conole[9]Yes[10]
2011ALDinHEQueen's UniversityEngaging Students - Engaging LearningPhil Race, Sally Brown, Becka ColleyYes[11]
2010ALDinHENottingham Trent UniversityCelebrating Partnerships in LearningMarcia Baxter-Magolda, Glynis CousinYes[12]
2009LDHENBournemouth UniversityThe challenge of learning developmentDennis Hayes, Alan MortiboysNo
2008LDHENBradford UniversityLearning Development – Who Needs It?Ray Land No
2007LDHENBournemouth UniversityHow do Students Engage with Learning??Ronald BarnettNo
2006LDHEN and LearnHigher CETLLiverpool Hope UniversityExcellence in Learning Development - What could it be? No
2005LDHENNorthumbria University 'Working for Students' Success Steven RowlandsNo
2003 LDHEN London Metropolitan University (none)PlenaryNo

Some observers may identify strong learning development themes in conferences in allied areas, such as Writing Development (e.g. Writing Development in Higher Education (WDHE) conferences and EATAW), Mathematics Support (e.g. the Sigma Network and the CETL-MSOR conferences) or even Educational Development (e.g. SEDA). Likewise, the HEA's What Works? conferences and the Improving Student Learning annual symposiums have strongly tangential themes. However, these organisations/conferences rarely use the term learning development to describe their activities.

Allied areas of practice

Writing development

Writing development is administratively subsumed within learning development at a number of UK universities, where practices may be merged locally. However, writing development has rich tradition of research and practice, established before learning development and representing a distinct field.

Information literacy

Information literacy is sometimes seen as learning development, but also has its own distinct body of practice and literature.

According to the SCONUL Working Group on Information Literacy (2011: 3),[13] Information Literacy is, "an umbrella term which encompasses concepts such as digital, visual and media literacies, academic literacy, information handling, information skills, data curation and data management."

SCONUL's seven pillars of information literacy are:[13]

Mathematics support

Learning development in numeracy, mathematics and statistics, commonly referred to as "mathematics support",[14] works with students and staff to develop mathematical practice in the disciplines. Mathematics Support ranges from basic adult numeracy[15] to advanced support for second and third year undergraduate mathematics students.[16] This provision is commonly provided via a mathematics (learning) support centre.[17]

The UK mathematics support movement is seen to have begun in 1993 with a conference held at the University of Luton and was influenced by the Minnesota model of developmental mathematics,[18] and may be considered as a sub-movement, separate and tangential to learning development.[19] A recent survey of mathematics support in the UK identified 88 out of 103 responding higher education institutions offering some form of mathematics support.[20]

Mathematics support centres and services are also present in Australia[21] and the Republic of Ireland.[22] Statistics support for final year undergraduate and postgraduate students is often provided via a statistics advisory service.[23]

Areas of learning development

Many learning developers resist categorising their practice into distinct subjects. For example, the use of statistics, encouraged by learning development, is cross-disciplinary, however, resources such as study guides are often categorised into distinct subjects. The following areas of learning development are taken from the LearnHigher website

When critical thinking is applied to external sources it is called critical analysis. Critical analysis is sometimes seen as the 'holy grail' of academic writing or a 'rite of passage' for students to become accepted members of their academic community of practice. There are several different approaches to critical analysis: critically analysing a single source using a premise, argument, conclusion, application approach; moving from descriptive writing to analytical writing to evaluative writing; comparing and contrasting two different opinions using a discursive argumentation format; moving from summarising, to making simple inferences, to critiquing according to objective criteria and bringing in a personal interpretation; and using a questioning approach (who, what, where, why, etc.) to brainstorm an issue.

A developmental model

The learning development movement emphasises learner development from any prior level of ability. This view is generally opposed to study skills that represent remedial education - aiming to bring weaker students up to a set standard. However, accepting that support may be the most developmental approach in some circumstances, study skills remain a feature of learning development..

Provision for strongly performing students and the extent to which a broader base of students should engage with learning development are both currently debated issues..

The characteristics of embedded provision, one-to-one provision and resource provision are each underpinned by the developmental model adopted by learning development.

Embedding

Teaching with learning objectives is also an effective way of integrating 'learning development' into the curriculum.[25] This characteristic is usually referred to as embedding.

One-to-one provision

Learning development practices have remained committed to provision one-to-one with academic staff.[26]

Influences

Research-informed practice in learning development has drawn on various traditions of research. Some key examples are provided below.

Assessment criteria

Lea and Street[27] have demonstrated that university staff in various disciplines have varying expectations of students in assignments. Rust et al advocate explicating assessment criteria to augment success not only in the short term, but also to better facilitate learning for the long term.[28] Nicol and Macfarlane-Dick summarise converging literature suggesting that internal feedback and student self-regulation are only possible with a good conception of the criteria.[29] This has prompted learning developers to work centrally to explicate or negotiate assessment criteria. This ranges from resources providing disciplinary definitions of keywords, to one-to-one practice to negotiate student understandings of assessment criteria with reference to assignment drafts.

See also

References

  1. Hilsdon, J. (2011). What is Learning Development? In P. Hartley, J. Hilsdon, C. Keenan, S. Sinfield & M. Verity, eds. Learning Development in Higher Education. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 13-27.
  2. Gosling, D. (2008) Educational Development in the United Kingdom. Heads of Educational Development Group. Available at: http://www.hedg.ac.uk/documents/HEDG_Report_final.pdf [Accessed 20 June 2013]
  3. Association for Learning Development in Higher Education (2012) Learning Development in Higher Education Network (LDHEN) [accessed 16/06/13]. Available from http://www.aldinhe.ac.uk/ldhen.html.
  4. Possibly influenced by understandings reflected in Lea, M. & Street, B. (1998) Student Writing in Higher Education: An Academic Literacies Approach, Studies in Higher Education, 29(6), pp. 157-172.
  5. http://www.aldinhe.ac.uk/solent15.htm
  6. http://www.aldinhe.ac.uk/events/8/aldinhe_conference_2016.html?p=7_10
  7. http://www.aldinhe.ac.uk/huddersfield14
  8. http://www.aldinhe.ac.uk/events/4/aldinhe_conference_2013.html?p=7_4
  9. in absentia
  10. http://www.aldinhe.ac.uk/index.php?p=7_1_7
  11. http://www.aldinhe.ac.uk/symposium11/player.html
  12. http://www.aldinhe.ac.uk/symposium10/player.html
  13. 1 2 SCONUL Working Group on Information Literacy (2011) The SCONUL Seven Pillars of information literacy: Core model for higher education. [pdf] Available at: http://www.sconul.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/coremodel.pdf [Accessed 20 June 2013].
  14. MacGillivray, H. and Croft, A.C. (2011) Understanding evaluation of learning support in mathematics and statistics, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(2), pp. 189–212.
  15. Coben, D., Colwell, D., Macrae, S., Boaler, J., Brown, M. and Rhodes, V. (2003) Adult numeracy: Review of research and related literature. London: National Research and Development Centre for Adult Literacy and Numeracy.
  16. Croft, A. C., and Grove, M. (2006) Mathematics Support: Support for the specialist mathematician and the more able student, MSOR Connections, 6(2), pp. 39-43.
  17. Lawson, D.A., Croft, A.C. and Halpin, M. (2003) Good practice in the provision of mathematics support centres. 2nd edn. Birmingham: LTSN Maths, Stats and OR Network. Available at: http://newukmlsc.lboro.ac.uk/resources/Good%20Practice%20Guide/goodpractice2E.pdf [Accessed: 20 June 2013].
  18. Beveridge, I. (1993) The Minnesota Model of Developmental Maths. Available at: http://www.sigma-cetl.ac.uk/index.php?action=download_resource&id=322&module=resourcesmodule&src=%40random4b8fd8fe5704c [Accessed 20 June 2013].
  19. Samuels, P. C. (2013) Promoting Learning Development as an Academic Discipline, Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 5, available at: http://www.aldinhe.ac.uk/ojs/index.php?journal=jldhe&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=146 [Accessed 20 June 2013].
  20. Perkin, G., Lawson, D. A. & Croft, A. C. (2012) Mathematics learning support in UK Higher Education: the extent of provision in 2012. [pdf] Birmingham: National HE STEM Programme. Available at: http://www.sigma-network.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/MathematicsLearningSupportProvision2012.pdf [Accessed 21 June 2013].
  21. MacGillivray, H. (2008) Learning Support in Mathematics and Statistics in Australian Universities: A Guide for the University Sector. Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
  22. Gill, O., O’Donoghue, J. and Johnson, P. (2008) An Audit of Mathematical Support Provisions in Irish Third Level Institutes. Limerick: CEMTL, University of Limerick.
  23. Smith, K. and Gadsden, R. (2006) Sigma SAS rescuing projects, In CETL MSOR Conference 2006, Loughborough University (ed. D. Green), pp. 149-154.
  24. Ennis, R. H. (no date) Critical thinking definition and Conceptualization. Available at: http://faculty.ed.uiuc.edu/rhennis/ConceptCT.html [Accessed 21 June 2013].
  25. Wingate, U. (2006). Doing away with ‘study skills’. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(4), 457-469.
  26. Turner, J. (2010) The Case for One-to-One Academic Advice for Students. Hartley, P., Hilsdon, J., Sinfield, S., Keenan, C., & Verity, M. (Eds.). (2010). "Learning development in higher education". Palgrave Macmillan.
  27. Lea, M. & Street, B. (2000)
  28. Rust, P. Price, M. & O’Donovan, B. (2003) Improving students' learning by developing their understanding of assessment criteria and processes. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(2), pp147-164.
  29. Nicol, D. J. & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006) Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), pp199-218. http://www.mmiweb.org.uk/hull/site/pt/downloads/nicol_formass.pdf
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 7/13/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.