Kendall rank correlation coefficient

"Tau coefficient" redirects here. It is not to be confused with Tau distribution.

In statistics, the Kendall rank correlation coefficient, commonly referred to as Kendall's tau coefficient (after the Greek letter τ), is a statistic used to measure the ordinal association between two measured quantities. A tau test is a non-parametric hypothesis test for statistical dependence based on the tau coefficient.

It is a measure of rank correlation: the similarity of the orderings of the data when ranked by each of the quantities. It is named after Maurice Kendall, who developed it in 1938,^[1] though Gustav Fechner had proposed a similar measure in the context of time series in 1897.^[2]

Intuitively, the Kendall correlation between two variables will be high when observations have a similar (or identical for a correlation of 1) rank (i.e. relative position label of the observations within the variable: 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc.) between the two variables, and low when observations have a dissimilar (or fully different for a correlation of −1) rank between the two variables.

Contrary to the Spearman correlation, the Kendall correlation is not affected by how far from each other ranks are but only by whether the ranks between observations are equal or not, and is thus only appropriate for discrete variables but not defined for continuous variables.

Both Kendall's $\tau$ and Spearman's $\rho$ can be formulated as special cases of a more general correlation coefficient.

Definition

Let (x₁, y₁), (x₂, y₂), …, (x_n, y_n) be a set of observations of the joint random variables X and Y respectively, such that all the values of (x_i) and (y_i) are unique. Any pair of observations (x_i, y_i) and (x_j, y_j), where $i\not =j$ , are said to be concordant if the ranks for both elements agree: that is, if both x_i > x_j and y_i > y_j or if both x_i < x_j and y_i < y_j. They are said to be discordant, if x_i > x_j and y_i < y_j or if x_i < x_j and y_i > y_j. If x_i = x_j or y_i = y_j, the pair is neither concordant nor discordant.

The Kendall τ coefficient is defined as:

\tau ={\frac {({\text{number of concordant pairs}})-({\text{number of discordant pairs}})}{n(n-1)/2}}.

^[3]

Properties

The denominator is the total number of pair combinations, so the coefficient must be in the range −1 ≤ τ ≤ 1.

If the agreement between the two rankings is perfect (i.e., the two rankings are the same) the coefficient has value 1.
If the disagreement between the two rankings is perfect (i.e., one ranking is the reverse of the other) the coefficient has value −1.
If X and Y are independent, then we would expect the coefficient to be approximately zero.

Hypothesis test

The Kendall rank coefficient is often used as a test statistic in a statistical hypothesis test to establish whether two variables may be regarded as statistically dependent. This test is non-parametric, as it does not rely on any assumptions on the distributions of X or Y or the distribution of (X,Y).

Under the null hypothesis of independence of X and Y, the sampling distribution of τ has an expected value of zero. The precise distribution cannot be characterized in terms of common distributions, but may be calculated exactly for small samples; for larger samples, it is common to use an approximation to the normal distribution, with mean zero and variance

{\frac {2(2n+5)}{9n(n-1)}}

.^[4]

Accounting for ties

A pair {(x_i, y_i), (x_j, y_j)} is said to be tied if x_i = x_j or y_i = y_j; a tied pair is neither concordant nor discordant. When tied pairs arise in the data, the coefficient may be modified in a number of ways to keep it in the range [−1, 1]:

Tau-a

The Tau-a statistic tests the strength of association of the cross tabulations. Both variables have to be ordinal. Tau-a will not make any adjustment for ties. It is defined as:

\tau _{A}={\frac {n_{c}-n_{d}}{n_{0}}}

where n_c, n_d and n₀ are defined as in the next section.

Tau-b

The Tau-b statistic, unlike Tau-a, makes adjustments for ties.^[5] ^[6] Values of Tau-b range from −1 (100% negative association, or perfect inversion) to +1 (100% positive association, or perfect agreement). A value of zero indicates the absence of association.

The Kendall Tau-b coefficient is defined as:

\tau _{B}={\frac {n_{c}-n_{d}}{\sqrt {(n_{0}-n_{1})(n_{0}-n_{2})}}}

where

{\begin{aligned}n_{0}&=n(n-1)/2\\n_{1}&=\sum _{i}t_{i}(t_{i}-1)/2\\n_{2}&=\sum _{j}u_{j}(u_{j}-1)/2\\n_{c}&={\text{Number of concordant pairs}}\\n_{d}&={\text{Number of discordant pairs}}\\t_{i}&={\text{Number of tied values in the }}i^{\text{th}}{\text{ group of ties for the first quantity}}\\u_{j}&={\text{Number of tied values in the }}j^{\text{th}}{\text{ group of ties for the second quantity}}\end{aligned}}

Tau-c

Tau-c (also called Stuart-Kendall Tau-c) differs from Tau-b as in being more suitable for rectangular tables than for square tables.

Significance tests

When two quantities are statistically independent, the distribution of $\tau$ is not easily characterizable in terms of known distributions. However, for $\tau _{A}$ the following statistic, $z_{A}$ , is approximately distributed as a standard normal when the variables are statistically independent:

z_{A}={3(n_{c}-n_{d}) \over {\sqrt {n(n-1)(2n+5)/2}}}

Thus, to test whether two variables are statistically dependent, one computes $z_{A}$ , and finds the cumulative probability for a standard normal distribution at $-|z_{A}|$ . For a 2-tailed test, multiply that number by two to obtain the p-value. If the p-value is below a given significance level, one rejects the null hypothesis (at that significance level) that the quantities are statistically independent.

Numerous adjustments should be added to $z_{A}$ when accounting for ties. The following statistic, $z_{B}$ , has the same distribution as the $\tau _{B}$ distribution, and is again approximately equal to a standard normal distribution when the quantities are statistically independent:

z_{B}={n_{c}-n_{d} \over {\sqrt {v}}}

where

{\begin{aligned}v&=(v_{0}-v_{t}-v_{u})/18+v_{1}+v_{2}\\v_{0}&=n(n-1)(2n+5)\\v_{t}&=\sum _{i}t_{i}(t_{i}-1)(2t_{i}+5)\\v_{u}&=\sum _{j}u_{j}(u_{j}-1)(2u_{j}+5)\\v_{1}&=\sum _{i}t_{i}(t_{i}-1)\sum _{j}u_{j}(u_{j}-1)/(2n(n-1))\\v_{2}&=\sum _{i}t_{i}(t_{i}-1)(t_{i}-2)\sum _{j}u_{j}(u_{j}-1)(u_{j}-2)/(9n(n-1)(n-2))\end{aligned}}

pvrank^[7] is a very recent R package that computes rank correlations and their p-values with various options for tied ranks. It is possible to compute exact Kendall coefficient test p-values for n ≤ 60.

Algorithms

The direct computation of the numerator $n_{c}-n_{d}$ , involves two nested iterations, as characterized by the following pseudo-code:

numer := 0
for i:=1..N-1 do
    for j:=i+1..N do
        numer := numer + sign(x[i] - x[j]) * sign(y[i] - y[j])
return numer

Although quick to implement, this algorithm is $O(n^{2})$ in complexity and becomes very slow on large samples. A more sophisticated algorithm^[8] built upon the Merge Sort algorithm can be used to compute the numerator in $O(n\cdot \log {n})$ time.

Begin by ordering your data points sorting by the first quantity, $x$ , and secondarily (among ties in $x$ ) by the second quantity, $y$ . With this initial ordering, $y$ is not sorted, and the core of the algorithm consists of computing how many steps a Bubble Sort would take to sort this initial $y$ . An enhanced Merge Sort algorithm, with $O(n\log n)$ complexity, can be applied to compute the number of swaps, $S(y)$ , that would be required by a Bubble Sort to sort $y_{i}$ . Then the numerator for $\tau$ is computed as:

n_{c}-n_{d}=n_{0}-n_{1}-n_{2}+n_{3}-2S(y),

where $n_{3}$ is computed like $n_{1}$ and $n_{2}$ , but with respect to the joint ties in $x$ and $y$ .

A Merge Sort partitions the data to be sorted, $y$ into two roughly equal halves, $y_{\mathrm {left} }$ and $y_{\mathrm {right} }$ , then sorts each half recursive, and then merges the two sorted halves into a fully sorted vector. The number of Bubble Sort swaps is equal to:

S(y)=S(y_{\mathrm {left} })+S(y_{\mathrm {right} })+M(Y_{\mathrm {left} },Y_{\mathrm {right} })

where $Y_{\mathrm {left} }$ and $Y_{\mathrm {right} }$ are the sorted versions of $y_{\mathrm {left} }$ and $y_{\mathrm {right} }$ , and $M(\cdot ,\cdot )$ characterizes the Bubble Sort swap-equivalent for a merge operation. $M(\cdot ,\cdot )$ is computed as depicted in the following pseudo-code:

function M(L[1..n], R[1..m])
    i := 1
    j := 1
    nSwaps := 0
    while i <= n  and j <= m do
        if R[j] < L[i] then
            nSwaps := nSwaps + n - i + 1
            j := j + 1
        else
            i := i + 1
    return nSwaps

A side effect of the above steps is that you end up with both a sorted version of $x$ and a sorted version of $y$ . With these, the factors $t_{i}$ and $u_{j}$ used to compute $\tau _{B}$ are easily obtained in a single linear-time pass through the sorted arrays.

References

↑ Kendall, M. (1938). "A New Measure of Rank Correlation". Biometrika. 30 (1–2): 81–89. doi:10.1093/biomet/30.1-2.81. JSTOR 2332226.
↑ Kruskal, W.H. (1958). "Ordinal Measures of Association". Journal of the American Statistical Association. 53 (284): 814–861. doi:10.2307/2281954. JSTOR 2281954. MR 100941.
↑ Nelsen, R.B. (2001), "Kendall tau metric", in Hazewinkel, Michiel, Encyclopedia of Mathematics, Springer, ISBN 978-1-55608-010-4
↑ Prokhorov, A.V. (2001), "Kendall coefficient of rank correlation", in Hazewinkel, Michiel, Encyclopedia of Mathematics, Springer, ISBN 978-1-55608-010-4
↑ Kendall, M. (1945). "The Treatment of Ties in Ranking Problems". Biometrika. 33 (3): 239–251. doi:10.1093/biomet/33.3.239. JSTOR 2332303.
↑ Agresti, A. (2010). Analysis of Ordinal Categorical Data (Second ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
↑ Amerise, I.L.; Marozzi, M.; Tarsitano, A. "R package pvrank".
↑ Knight, W. (1966). "A Computer Method for Calculating Kendall's Tau with Ungrouped Data". Journal of the American Statistical Association. 61 (314): 436–439. doi:10.2307/2282833. JSTOR 2282833.

External links

Statistics

Descriptive statistics

Continuous data

Center	Mean arithmetic geometric harmonic Median Mode

Dispersion	Variance Standard deviation Coefficient of variation Percentile Range Interquartile range

Shape	Moments Skewness Kurtosis L-moments

Count data

Index of dispersion

Summary tables

Dependence

Graphics

Data collection

Study design	Population Statistic Effect size Statistical power Sample size determination Missing data

Survey methodology	Sampling Standard error stratified cluster Opinion poll Questionnaire

Controlled experiments	Design control optimal Controlled trial Randomized Random assignment Replication Blocking Interaction Factorial experiment

Uncontrolled studies	Observational study Natural experiment Quasi-experiment

Statistical inference

Statistical theory

Frequentist inference

Point estimation	Estimating equations Maximum likelihood Method of moments M-estimator Minimum distance Unbiased estimators Mean-unbiased minimum-variance Rao–Blackwellization Lehmann–Scheffé theorem Median unbiased Plug-in

Interval estimation	Confidence interval Pivot Likelihood interval Prediction interval Tolerance interval Resampling Bootstrap Jackknife

Testing hypotheses	1- & 2-tails Power Uniformly most powerful test Permutation test Randomization test Multiple comparisons

Parametric tests	Likelihood-ratio Wald Score

Specific tests

Z (normal) Student's t-test F

Goodness of fit	Chi-squared Kolmogorov–Smirnov Anderson–Darling Normality (Shapiro–Wilk) Likelihood-ratio test Model selection Cross validation AIC BIC

Rank statistics	Sign Sample median Signed rank (Wilcoxon) Hodges–Lehmann estimator Rank sum (Mann–Whitney) Nonparametric anova 1-way (Kruskal–Wallis) 2-way (Friedman) Ordered alternative (Jonckheere–Terpstra)

Bayesian inference

Correlation	Pearson product–moment Partial correlation Confounding variable Coefficient of determination

Regression analysis	Errors and residuals Regression model validation Mixed effects models Simultaneous equations models Multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS)

Linear regression	Simple linear regression Ordinary least squares General linear model Bayesian regression

Non-standard predictors	Nonlinear regression Nonparametric Semiparametric Isotonic Robust Heteroscedasticity Homoscedasticity

Generalized linear model	Exponential families Logistic (Bernoulli) / Binomial / Poisson regressions

Partition of variance	Analysis of variance (ANOVA, anova) Analysis of covariance Multivariate ANOVA Degrees of freedom

Categorical / Multivariate / Time-series / Survival analysis

Categorical

Multivariate

Time-series

General	Decomposition Trend Stationarity Seasonal adjustment Exponential smoothing Cointegration Structural break Granger causality

Specific tests	Dickey–Fuller Johansen Q-statistic (Ljung–Box) Durbin–Watson Breusch–Godfrey

Time domain	Autocorrelation (ACF) partial (PACF) Cross-correlation (XCF) ARMA model ARIMA model (Box–Jenkins) Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (ARCH) Vector autoregression (VAR)

Frequency domain	Spectral density estimation Fourier analysis Wavelet

Survival

Survival function	Kaplan–Meier estimator (product limit) Proportional hazards models Accelerated failure time (AFT) model First hitting time

Hazard function	Nelson–Aalen estimator

Test	Log-rank test

Applications

Biostatistics	Bioinformatics Clinical trials / studies Epidemiology Medical statistics

Engineering statistics	Chemometrics Methods engineering Probabilistic design Process / quality control Reliability System identification

Social statistics	Actuarial science Census Crime statistics Demography Econometrics National accounts Official statistics Population statistics Psychometrics

Spatial statistics	Cartography Environmental statistics Geographic information system Geostatistics Kriging

Category
Portal
Commons
WikiProject

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/20/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.