G 1/15
G 1/15 is a case decided by the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office (EPO) on the issue of partial priority following a referral under Article 112(1)(a) EPC. The questions referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal sought "to clarify how Article 88(2), second sentence, EPC is to be applied in the light of the Enlarged Board's decision G 2/98 in cases where a claim encompasses, without spelling them out, alternative subject-matters having all the features of the claim (known as a generic "OR"-claim), and whether parent and divisional applications may be prior art under Article 54(3) EPC against one another in respect of subject-matter disclosed in a priority application but not entitled to priority."[1]
The case, triggered by decision T 557/13 issued on 17 July 2015 by Board of Appeal 3.3.06,[2] had led the President of the EPO to decide that "all proceedings before EPO examining and opposition divisions in which the decision depends entirely" on the outcome of the case are to "be stayed ex officio until the Enlarged Board issues its decision".[1][3] The case has attracted more than thirty amicus curiae briefs.[4][5] Oral proceedings were held on 7 June 2016 at the EPO in Munich, Germany.[6][7]
The order, which was issued on November 29, 2016, reads:
| “ | Under the EPC, entitlement to partial priority may not be refused for a claim encompassing alternative subject-matter by virtue of one or more generic expressions or otherwise (generic "OR"-claim) provided that said alternative subject-matter has been disclosed for the first time, directly, or at least implicitly, unambiguously and in an enabling manner in the priority document. No other substantive conditions or limitations apply in this respect.[8] | ” |
The actual reasoned decision has not been issued yet.[9]
See also
References
- 1 2 "Notice from the European Patent Office dated 2 October 2015 concerning the staying of proceedings due to referral G 1/15". EPO Official Journal November 2015 (A92). European Patent Office. 30 November 2015. Retrieved 30 December 2015.
- ↑ Smyth, Darren (13 August 2015). "Partial Priority - questions for the Enlarged Board now revealed". IPKat. Retrieved 14 May 2016.
- ↑ Brophy, David (3 November 2015). "President pauses processing of potentially poisonous priorities". IPKat. Retrieved 14 May 2016.
- ↑ "G1/15: amicus curiae briefs". European Patent Office. 8 April 2016. Retrieved 14 May 2016.
- ↑ Pearce, David (3 March 2016). "G 1/15 Amicus Briefs". Tufty the Cat blog. Retrieved 14 May 2016.
- ↑ van der Eijk, W. (10 March 2016). "Case Number G 1/15 - Order". Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office. Retrieved 15 May 2016.
- ↑ Pearce, David (11 May 2016). "G 1/15 (partial priority) - an update". Tufty the Cat blog. Retrieved 15 May 2016. Pearce, David (7 June 2016). "G 1/15: The wait is nearly over". Tufty the Cat blog. Retrieved 10 June 2016.
- ↑ G 1/15 Order, European Patent Register, European patent application No. 98203458.9
- ↑ "Enlarged Board of Appeal of the EPO rules on partial priorities". European Patent Office. 2 December 2016. Retrieved 3 December 2016.
Further reading
- Smyth, Darren; Barker, Robert (2016). "To Infinium and beyond! Questions regarding partial priority referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal". Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. Oxford University Press. 11 (4): 222–223. doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpv259.
External links
- Technical Board of Appeal decision T 0557/13 from Board 3.3.06, from which the referral originates (regarding EP 0921183 - see also European Patent Register entry)
- Notice from the European Patent Office dated 2 October 2015 concerning the staying of proceedings due to referral G 1/15 (EPO Official Journal, 2015, A92)